Aim High
Reimagining how potential recruits match with recruiters
OVERVIEW
Matching recruits with Air Force careers
The US Air Force Aim High App (325k registered users) is a recruiting tool that connects potential recruits with careers through content, photos, events, and news.
For this project, my task was to reimagine the “find a recruiter” feature to ensure interested candidates could easily find and connect with a recruiter in the area.
Goals
Match potential recruits
Improve drop off rate
Boost conversion
Outcomes
30k Leads
40k Monthly Visitors
9.9k Referrals
Key Design Elements
Location-based search
Filtering
Recruiter profile
Current design observations and user feedback
UNDERSTAND
To start the redesign, I first conducted an audit of the existing design for finding a recruiter to highlight areas of improvement. During this process, I was able to connect with current users and recruiters as well to understand pain points with the current structure.
AUDIT
-
The candidate may not be familiar with what each component is or what the acronyms are for each
Differentiating between the different recruiters by their component is difficult
The Special Operations portion seems disconnected
Once the form fields are filled out and you arrive on the map, the globe icon action in the top right is a bit confusing
-
There are multiple recruiter types and these aren’t clearly being communicated as of now:
Enlisted Accessions - Recruits are often in High School, no college degree
Officer Accessions - Recruits must have a 4 year degree (or close to grad) to join the Air Force as an officer
Healthcare - Recruits must be attending college for healthcare or have a degree in healthcare
-
Recruitment is a very competitive space. Recruiters want leads and they want those leads to convert into airmen. They have weekly / monthly / annual numbers to meet and have multiple awards and competitions they engage in constantly.
If the candidate proceeds with contacting a recruiter and they do not qualify for that recruiter’s specialty, sometimes they simply get dropped instead of referred.
Special Warfare is a portion of the Air Force with high physical qualifications that often goes unmentioned. Special Warfare recruiters would like more visibility.
findings
Key Takeaways
Use familiar language
Clearly communicate qualifications and types of recruitment
DEFINE
More communication upfront = higher matchability probability
Now that I had a better understanding of the current process and its pain points, I mapped out the user journey for the redesigned flow with details on changes as well as items that would stay the same.
User journey
Key Takeaways
Location should be top priority
Focus on discovery; rather than filtering (as users might not have a lot of knowledge of all the types)
Add more detail to recruiter profile for easy contact information
SKETCH
Initial feature refresh to enhance matching
Taking my user journey map and audit as a guideline, I sketched out new screen variations for the find recruiter flow.
Added details on areas of interest to educate users
New description on recruiter profile reiterates type of recruiter as well as who they assist
Removed Special Ops > instead will be listed within recruiter details
If user wants to connect, they can submit contact form or message directly in app
New descriptions for career categories & their corresponding recruiters
Label replaces prior letter components for Active Duty, National Guard, etc. to better communicate to users which component they are in
Adding more focus on location and filter options
ITERATION
At this point, I showcased my initial sketches to the team and there were a few changes we wanted to implement.
More focus on location at this first step (remove interest)
More prominent filter on recruiter results
Updated description to give more details on career
VALIDATION
A more direct, communicative experience for recruit matching
Once we were aligned in changes, I created a prototype to bring the redesign to life and test out the interaction elements. For this redesign, we relied on an informal usability test process where we solicited feedback from our main stakeholders.
Small changes can have a large impact on product usability & satisfaction
CONCLUSION
This was an exciting project to work on as I’ve always been interested in how technology can be utilized to match people with careers. There was a bit of learning curve understanding how the Air Force organizes their recruiting, so that was a large challenge when getting started.
Overall, this redesign taught me how to small collective changes can help build engagement and user retention.